Participation in a collaborative
learning community plays a key role in making the community work. Assessment should be carefully considered
according to the situation. George
Siemens (2013) discussed the models of assessment in a collaborative environment
which included students assessing their peers, students receiving feedback from
online environments, and educator assessment through collaborative
involvement. They type of activity
provided by the instructor should determine the appropriate assessment. Rubrics are an effective way to ensure that
everyone understands what is expected of them.
Palloff and Pratt (2005) discuss the use of portfolios as a great way to
assess individual and collaborative participation.
“Student assessment of any kind requires
that the teacher be explicit, fair, consistent, and as objective as possible”
(Anderson, 2008, p.353). Instructors
must be open-minded and have an understanding of the online community. Palloff and Pratt (2005) mention the aspect
of instructors not assuming that all students understand the importance of
collaboration. One example is of myself
verses many of the other students in my class.
I am a first time technology major.
All of my other degrees are in early childhood education and
mathematics. I decided to do my EdS in
Educational Technology when I was asked to oversee an online program we are
currently using. I am unaware of much of
the prior knowledge that many of my classmates are quite fluent in. The same is true for those who are new to the
online community. It is difficult to transition
from what we are used to as discussed by George Siemens.
Students that sign up for an online
class should be mentally prepared to collaborate. I have taken several online classes and they
all require some sort of collaboration.
Students who are not willing to work with this sort of environment
should be leery of taking an online course. Members of the community could try to ensure
confidence about what can be learned from this type of environment. “If students are clear from the beginning of
the course “we are all in this together,” then
incorporating collaborative activity into the course happens much more easily”
(Palloff & Pratt, 2007, p.159). If
the instructor ensures that this is stressed during the first week of the
course it may encourage someone to become part of the learning community or
change to a more individualized class setting.
References:
Laureate
Education, Inc. (Producer). (2010). Assessment of Collaborative Learning [Video
webcast]. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_3462449_1%26url%3D
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online
learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2005). Collaborating
online: Learning together in community. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Solita,
ReplyDeleteNice post! You mentioned an online student must be mentally prepared to collaborate. I think that statement is so true. I also believe that should be coupled with knowledge of technological pedagogy (Anderson, 2008; Swan, 2004). When one understands why things are being done, he/she is usually more likely to go along to learn. When I started my doctoral studies, I was new to online learning. I had a major learning curve. It took me a minute to learn exactly how to interact with my peers, especially when I was providing them feedback. I had to remove my teacher hat sometimes to be a good collaborator. I had to think like a partner. As I became more comfortable, I got better and learned to lean on my online buddies.
Stacey
Anderson, T. (Ed.). (2008). The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed.). Edmonton, AB: Athabasca University Press.
Swan, K. (2004). Relationships between interactions and learning in online environments. The Sloan Consortium.